Navigating through the storm when the church is adrift

What can the faithful do when the church is spiritually adrift? When the authority of Scripture is being challenged over sexuality and ordination — what better opportunity to remind ourselves to be anchored in Christ and look for a safe harbour.

For inspiration, we turned to our new friends at Cruxifusion, a network of ministers who are centred on Christ. They’re self-described as an “evangelical, traditional, orthodox, conservative” witnesses. They arose from the roots of the former United Church Renewal Fellowship, Community of Concern, National Alliance of Covenanting Congregations, and Church Alive. Those four groups formed at various times and each had a slightly different focus, whether spiritual, political, or theological. When the United Church decided to ordain those in LGB communities in 1988, many members of those renewal groups departed the denomination. Those who remained in the UC wrestled with their purpose. In time, they struggled with membership and energy. Despite the theological drift in the UCC, young orthodox ministers were still entering the denomination. With seed money and spiritual support from the old renewal groups, Cruxifusion was born in 2010. They’ve been a safe harbour for like kinds and a witness for Christ.

Renewal’s Board gathered by Zoom with some members of the Cruxifusion Board of Directors and supporters last September to hear their stories. Among them was Rev. Dr. Greg Brawn. We invited him to share his hope and witness at our annual Renewal Day on April 17, 2021, by Zoom for a day of worship, prayer, group discussion, and inspiration.

Rev. Dr. Greg BrawnRev. Dr. Greg Brawn
Theme Speaker

Rev. Dr. Greg Brawn, is a voice for orthodoxy within The United Church of Canada, a minister with a passion for Christ, and pastor of a vibrant Christ-centred congregation, Byron United Church in London, Ontario, since 2007. He was ordained in 1998 and has ministered in Nova Scotia and Newfoundland. In 2019, Greg completed his Doctor of Ministry in Preaching degree from McCormick Theological Seminary. He is passionate about working with others to build communities of holy joy, faith, and love. He is a member of the Board of Directors of Cruxifusion. Greg brought words of hope and encouragement to those who are discerning their place in The Presbyterian Church in Canada.

Here are some notable quotes.

“I’ve been invited to talk to you about what it’s like to be an evangelical in a liberal denomination. … Twenty years ago I thought there was no hope, no future for our denomination; in fact, I thought it wouldn’t exist, or it would break up. That hasn’t happened.

“I’m not going to give you a solution. I can’t do that. … It’s a complex situation.

“There is a godly future for you and the PCC.”

“The United Church turned liberal in the 1950s and continued until about 10 years ago. That was the climax. The pendulum had come to swing back to Christology and Trinitarianism and to some extent, biblical authority. … Keep the faith. The Lord will bring you through this.”

“Avoid the temptation to ‘burn it all down’, wash your hands, walk away, and shake the dust off.”

“A strategy here is not to focus on the denomination. … We don’t use the United Church hymn book, we don’t buy the UCC Sunday School resources or Bible study curriculum.” At the same time, “do participate in your courts, but not as a disrupter. Pay presbytery assessments and do the paper work. … Be the local church of Jesus Christ.”

“Even within our congregation there are people who take the Bible literally and there are people who are quite liberal. … When we invite new members, we give them space.”

“Your calling — our calling — is to proclaim the Gospel to every creature in word and in deed and show how attractive a life lived in union with Jesus Christ is.”

“My future and salvation are not dependent on the United Church of Canada and your future and your salvation are not dependent on the Presbyterian Church in Canada. Amen!”

Letter to Assembly Council re: Gracious Dismissal

Following the Assembly Council’s refusal to receive the report of its own Gracious Dismissal Committee, several members of Psalt drafted the following letter to the Assembly Council, which was signed by 303 people. It was received for information, but unfortunately, no discussion or action was taken on it.

Stephen Kendall sent the following reply after the Assembly Council meeting:

“I wanted to let you know that the Assembly Council members all received your letter and it was placed on the agenda under correspondence. It was received for information. Given the timing of both the receipt of the letter and the work Assembly Council is needing to accomplish before the Assembly, we are not able to provide a more substantial response. However, very similar concerns have been raised with the Council and will be responded to in the Council’s report to Assembly.”

We have asked the Assembly Council to address this more fully at its May meeting.


March 1, 2021

To the Assembly Council,

First, we thank the members of the Council for devoting time and effort to the orderly running of the Presbyterian Church in Canada. Being willing to step into a leadership role shows a servant heart. We also acknowledge this may well be a stressful time for many of you, in which the weight of leadership is keenly felt. Know that we are praying for you regularly, asking God to grant you wisdom and a peace-filled “holy indifference” that leaves you truly open to God’s leading as you seek to care for the church Jesus paid for with his blood.

While at times the PCC’s careful following of our Book of Forms and our traditions can seem onerous, we recognize the wisdom of being very careful to follow tried and true protocols with faithful transparency. This will reassure all groups and build trust. We also believe it will protect the Assembly Council itself. Thus, we are deeply concerned to read that the Assembly Council has taken a significant detour from regular proceedings. The matter of Gracious Dismissal has been before the church since 2015. The General Assembly gave it to the Assembly Council to prepare a report and permission was granted for this report to be presented at the 2020 General Assembly. We are grateful the Council’s sub-committee worked hard to prepare a carefully researched report in a timely manner. We fully expected the Assembly Council to carefully consider the report of their task force and use that hard work to prepare an answer for the General Assembly’s prayerful consideration. You have voted to not follow this expected practice. We find this very troubling.

We quote from the dissent found in the minutes of October’s Assembly Council meeting, “The Assembly Council’s terms of reference includes the obligation to ‘assist the General Assembly in making responsible decisions by ensuring that both the Council, and the Assembly, have before them all the information that is needed and that is pertinent to the matter in hand in order to make a wise decision’. General Assembly specifically asked for such assistance and the Assembly Council has now chosen to deny such assistance during a time when the matter is contentious and relevant. That is a failure of leadership; that is a dereliction of duty.”

We believe the Assembly Council’s refusal to receive the sub-committee report in October is an unwise decision and potentially a dangerous precedent that will heighten tension and could place the Assembly Council in a difficult and defensive position. We also “find the recorded dissents in the October minutes compelling in their passion and reason”. While we recognize some in the Assembly Council felt the report should be left until after the remits have been addressed, we strongly feel complete, truthful and well researched information faithfully shared with transparency is always best. Decisions made out of fear and without all the relevant information are never good ones. Truth really does set us free, facilitating a prayerful and holy openness to God’s leading and avoiding any semblance of human manipulation or pressure.

We are also concerned that the Assembly Council has not even discussed the report. We are aware that David Jennings, Linda Shaw and Barbara Sargent have spent countless hours of volunteer time in meetings and research and believe “they have worked diligently and seriously to produce a report that would be fair to any and all congregations and not just one group”. We agree with another quote from the October minutes: “The debates about the human sexuality / authority of scripture / justice matters should be based on theology and ecclesiology, not on property. By providing a clear, neutral answer to the question of Gracious Dismissal as an option, the debates can focus on the issues themselves, without the fear of the practical imposition of results on a congregation feeling threatened with the removal of its sanctuary and other church property. If Gracious Dismissal as a concept is found to be both possible and desirable by the General Assembly, it is the goal of the Committee to make Gracious Dismissal accessible, just and rare.”

The Assembly Council receiving a report for consideration does not require unanimous agreement with the report. Our confidence and trust in the national leaders would be enhanced if Council had received the report, considered the concerns that motivated the overtures, and offered a theological rationale for saying no. As it is, Council’s decision not to receive the report suggests a disregard for the concerns behind the overtures.. We also believe it is the place of the General Assembly to make the final decision on this issue, bearing in mind the advice of the Assembly Council.

We understand the Assembly Council previously felt there was no possible way to move forward with Gracious Dismissal, but asked your sub-committee to research the question more deeply. Their report suggests there well may be a way forward that allows all to be treated with grace. Whether the remits pass or fail, there will likely be congregations who will seriously consider their future in the PCC, if not over this issue, then over other deeply held convictions. Those who prepared the remits have sought to show compassion and fairness to fellow brothers and sisters in Christ who hold different views on some matters; we believe carefully considering a Gracious Dismissal process continues on that same path of grace, compassion, fairness and justice.

Assembly Council has repeatedly indicated it welcomes input, a heartening and welcome message. Overtures are the accepted way for Sessions and Presbyteries to express their prayerful desires. They are not submitted lightly. Twenty or more overtures from across the country asking the General Assembly to address this issue have been submitted already. This is a broad concern. It is one thing to ask for input; how the Assembly Council responds to that input sends the real message. How can we feel we will be real partners in the future if concerns raised now are not taken seriously? The decision not to prepare a recommendation regarding Gracious Dismissal to the upcoming General Assembly has already damaged the bonds of partnership between the national leaders and local congregations. Dealing with the report on Gracious Dismissal and presenting a recommendation the Assembly can consider along with the remits this year won’t undo that damage, but it is a necessary first step in rebuilding trust.

We respectfully ask that the Assembly Council give this report the attention it deserves in a timely way. We ask that the report be made available for the upcoming General Assembly as planned. We also ask that this report be addressed before the Remits are discussed for the reasons given above.

Signed,

Jonathan Dent — David Chung — Rev. George Robertson — Jan Robertson — James A. Dunlop — Rev. Timothy Ferrier — John Matheson — Rev. Sandra Copland Dufour — Rev. Dr. Martin Kreplin — Joan Knox — Andy Van Bodegom — Carol Van Bodegom — Benoit Cousineau — Don Nicol — Len Wolstenholme — Freddie Saleh — Ronda Bosch — Mary Moore — Ron French — Philip MacFie — John Van Gyssel — Grant Wilson — Ken Oakes — Anne Hawes — Brian Wilson — Rev. Miklos Szigeti — Robert Ferrier — Norine Love — Rev. Stephen G. Dunkin — Susan Dunkin — Bernard Skelding — Jos Haye — Harry Austen — Myrna Austen — Alvin Kim — Rev. Joel Coppieters — Rev. Dr. Neal Mathers — Nagi Said — Ross Davidson — Jon Dykeman — Joan Wilson — Linda Clarke — Virginia Head — Karl Reichert — Blake William Walker — Douglas Cameron — Erin King — John Roycroft — George Malcolm — Anne Houston — Alan Brewster — Anne Stewart — Okechukwu Chukwu — Rev. Alex Douglas — Irene Oakes — Terry Hagen — Susan Mattinson — Cathy Faubert — Stephen Kwon — Ed Renaud — Jonathan Dennis — Donald Bartlett — Shannon Bell — Glenn Marnoch — Rev Grant Gunnink — Paul Barrett — James Statham — Bruce Wilcox — Henry Heung Ryeol Han — Yongwan Cho — Winston Newman — Kathy Newman — Alfred Lee — Shirley Quinn — Rev. Munhyun Ryu — Martyn Van Essen — Jong Woog Kim — Rob Allan — Hyo young Joo — Rev. Andy Cornell — Lois Wallace — David Charles Wakeham — Peter J. Morrison — George Habib — Donna Dawson — Dr. James Gordon — Adel Shenouda — Makram Barsoum — John Park — Stanley Cox — Daniel Nortes — Wadie Rezk — Kevin Livingston — Nan St. Louis — Don Lipsett — Sean Lee — Inkyu Park — Taesic Ha — Chris Little — Janet de Groot — Seong In Chin — Sunghwan Jang — Douglas Johns — Carey Jo Johnston — Sherif Bakhoum — Rev. Murat Kuntel — Christopher Jorna — J Richard Hendry — Mary Jane (Jay) Hendry — Heather Butterfill — Dr. Terry Fellows — Stuart W. McKim — Karen McKim — Tom LeBlanc — Nancy LeBlanc — Loreen Newman — Murray Park — Jean Park — Hugh clugston — Lorraine Clugston — Chris Gleimius — David Chambers — Priscilla Anderson — Donald Scott — David Spencer — Henk Vanden Beukel — Emese Zaduban — William Pettit — Terry Hibbert — Barbara Ferrier — Floyd McPhee — Jim Mason — Lyle Beckett — Roy Stevenson — James Knott — Ruth Ann Beckett — Linda Paquette — Linda Low — Steve Lindsay — Kenneth Kupisz — Cahl D. Brown — Jane Wright — Sylvia Dresser — Brian Wright — Ingrid Navidad — Heather Wilson — Wayne Dewart — Jerry Low — Rev. James Perrie — Marion R. Perrie — Les K. Ferrier — Lorraine Webber — Bill Harrison — Maureen A. Brewster — Philip Marais — Diana Wadsworth — Graham Finlayson — Colleen Finlayson — Bernard C. Coram — Duncan Cameron — Jim McIntosh — Rhonda McIntosh — Muriel Barrington — Joseph Mick — Peter Bloom — Pauline Gleimius — Gerry de Koning — Rev. David Leggatt — Tom Eyre — Richard Clough — Dr. Winston Dykeman — Monica McClure — Colleen Richardson — Bob Kettyle — Carol Kettyle — George Kodous — Saad Saad — Adel Ashamalla — Morgan Morgan — Shaddy Hanna — Rev. Emery Cawsey — Joseph N. Gray — Myung Soo Son — Michael Degazio — Nam Sun Choi — Doreen Dath — Robb MacHattie — Doug Austin — George Myers — Robin Davidson — Bill Kunkel — Mary Beth McLean — Lynda Smith — Wayne Smith — Rev. Dr. Mark Richardson — Linda Myers — Jim Robertson — ChangYong Park — Bruce Hunter — Rev. Dr. Wayne Hancock — Robert (Bob) Martin — Rev. Paul Robinson — John Fair — Martha Fair — Rev. Harvey Osborne — Dr. Gavin Richardson — Elaine Richardson — Philip Kim — Derrek Konrad — Olivia McMillan — Ellen Konrad — Bruce Metzger — Rev. Henry Huberts — Jean Clelland — Rev. Paula Hamilton — Rev. Dr. Tom Hamilton — Kristen Higgs — Larry McPhee — Lois McPhee — Sangheon (Eugene) Woo — Sangsoon Lee — Yealin Woo — Soohwan Woo — Moonjung Choi — Young Eun You — Joseph Choi — Jonathan Choi — Marion Burn — Myeongjin Nam — Kyoungsung Lee — Hyeryoung Choi — Dukki Kim — Hyanglan Lee — Atef Bakhiet — Marcelle Bakhiet — James Watson — Lynda Watson — Rev. Glen Sampson — Robert Telfer — Joan Stevenson — Rosemary Sanderson — Evelyn McCarthy — Joan Burdock — Dan Shute — Joan Kennedy — Norma Emmons — Janet Lee — Elaine Taylor — Rev. Carol Hamilton — Mark Carter — Brian Hession — Susan Hession — Larry Price — Bruce Boyes — Marianne Collin — Pauline McConaghy — Patricia Earl — Brian Earl — James Douglas — Saemeyna Oh — Alta MacFie — James MacFie — Hyangjin Lee — Rev. Edward Charlton — Rev. Dr. Don Faris — Neil Cameron — Colin Leonard — Jim Paterson — Daniel Lobb — Susanna Hamilton — Michaela Vandyke — Joanne Ferrier — Myrna Talbot — Elizabeth Matthias — Bobby Ogdon — Margit Meszaros — John Head — Ross McClelland — George E. Anderson — Marlene Larabie — Robert F. Richardson — Shelagh Stevens — Jan Kuehn — Reiner Kuehn — Tressa Oliver — Moheb Nasr — David Oliver — Allan Gunnesslal — Sharon Dowdall — Samy Said — Marie Gemmill — Walter Gemmill — Ken Fournier — Melissa Valliquette — Irene Nesbitt — Renee Guirguis — Guirguis Guirguis — John Sinton — Yohana Kimoun Ntienjem — Emad Ibrahim — Gamal Hanna — Sarah Choi — Donna Thomas

Presbytery of Montreal Overtures

Ten overtures transmitted by the Presbytery of Montreal:

  1. Overture from the Presbytery of Montreal requesting consideration of the report of the Gracious Dismissal Committee before proceeding to discussions about Remits “B” and “C” from the 145th General Assembly (2019).
  2. Overture from the Presbytery of Montreal requesting the charting of a clear and non-punitive way forward for congregations who feel that they must withdraw from the denomination for theological reasons.
  3. Overture from the Presbytery of Montreal requesting the restructuring of the PCC into non-geographic synods along theological lines.
  4. Overture from the Presbytery of Montreal requesting the national church to pay any court costs and fines incurred in refusing to conduct a same-sex marriage or to participate in a LGBTQI ordination.
  5. Overture from the Presbytery of Montreal requesting amendment of Paragraph 48 of the Book of Forms regarding moving to an immediate vote, by replacing the words “if carried in the affirmative” with “if carried by a two-thirds majority vote”.
  6. Overture from the Arabic Presbyterian Church of Montreal requesting the formation of two synods, each national in scope, with autonomy in doctrinal issues, discipline, etc., and the formation of presbyteries along generous regional and theological lines, confining General Assembly responsibilities to matters common to both synods.
  7. Overture from the Montreal Chinese Presbyterian Church requesting consideration of the report of the Gracious Dismissal Committee before proceeding to discussions about Remits “B” and “C” from the 145th General Assembly (2019).
  8. Overture from the Montreal Chinese Presbyterian Church requesting the restructuring of the PCC into non-geographic synods and presbyteries, so that congregations are given full liberty of conscience and action in matters regarding human sexuality while maintaining vital central administrative functions.
  9. Overture from Kensington Presbyterian Church urging endorsement of Remit B (2019) and Remit C (2019), adopting them as amendments to church law, and working together on what we share, our common belief in, worship of, and service to our God in Christ.
  10. Overture from the Church of St. Andrew and St. Paul requesting the establishment of an up-to-date national registry of ministers and congregations regarding their willingness or unwillingness to celebrate same-sex marriages, and the formation of guidelines by which a minister unwilling to celebrate same-sex marriages would refer a couple to a minister who would.

Parkwood Ottawa Overture re: Separate Synods

WHEREAS The Presbyterian Church in Canada was formed in 1875 as a union of several branches of the reformed and presbyterian Church, all of which held the Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments as the only rule of faith and life and subscribed to the Westminster Confession of Faith as the principal subordinate standard; and

WHEREAS the peace of The Presbyterian Church in Canada was threatened within the first decade of its union by a dispute over marriage — specifically, a dispute over who one was permitted or not permitted to marry; and

WHEREAS the resolution of that dispute entailed an amendment to the basis of subscription to the Westminster Confession, permitting liberty of conscience on one of the clauses concerning marriage; and

WHEREAS the peace of The Presbyterian Church in Canada is at present threatened once again by a dispute over marriage — specifically, a dispute over who one should be permitted or not permitted to marry; and

WHEREAS the unity of The Presbyterian Church in Canada is also at present threatened by a dispute over ordination — specifically, a dispute over who a session is permitted to ordain and admit as an elder and who a presbytery is permitted to ordain and induct or install; and

WHEREAS this dispute over ordination affects the very nature of a session or a presbytery as a mutually submissive and collegial body of presbuteroi at the heart of the presbyterian understanding and practice of authority within the Church; and

WHEREAS the preservation of the peace and unity of Christ throughout the Church is part of the solemn obligation undertaken by all ministers and elders as a vow at ordination; and

WHEREAS the 145th General Assembly sent to presbyteries under the Barrier Act a remit (styled Remit B) asserting that “The Presbyterian Church in Canada holds two parallel definitions of marriage” without offering any basis in either the Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments as the principal standard or in the Westminster Confession of Faith or in Living Faith as subordinate standards for such an assertion; and

WHEREAS the 145th General Assembly sent to presbyteries under the Barrier Act a remit (styled Remit C) affirming among other things that certain individuals may be ordained as ministers and elders provided that “liberty of conscience and action regarding participation” in such ordinations be granted to ministers and elders, without offering any basis in the Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments as the principal standard or in the Westminster Confession of Faith or in Living Faith as subordinate standards for such provision, nor providing any basis on which to reconcile such a provision with the recognized principles and practice of Presbyterian Churches as laid down generally in “The Form of Presbyterial Church Government”; and

WHEREAS the 146th General Assembly on the basis of returns from presbyteries may find itself to be in a position to consider and adopt the changes inherent in Remit B and C, 2019, without having offered to the presbyteries or received from the presbyteries their concurrent opinions or judgements on the real and likely effect and impact of such changes on the peace and unity of Christ throughout the Church resulting from such a change of doctrine not rooted in the confessional standards of the church and such a change in polity not rooted in the principles of presbyterial church government; and

WHEREAS considered and substantive available legal opinion suggests that the continuing freedom for ministers and churches to hold and practice marriage on a different basis than that embraced by civil society may best be preserved by ensuring that the doctrine confessed and the discipline exercised by and for ministers and sessions is ordered in and by a consistent and cohesive ecclesiastical framework; and

WHEREAS it is incumbent upon all ministers and elders of The Presbyterian Church in Canada to devote time, talent, and treasure to the furtherance of Christ’s gospel in and for the world, undistracted and unhindered by the diversion and diffusion of further efforts and energies directed at resolving a fundamental impasse on two irreconcilable definitions of marriage and by implication those deemed eligible for ministry; and

WHEREAS the Scriptures testify that Paul (without John Mark) and Barnabas (with John Mark) parted company for a time when their disagreement over the eligibility of John Mark as a candidate for missionary service led them to a sharp disagreement (Acts 15: 39), and yet later the same Paul eagerly sought the same John Mark’s help “because he is helpful to me in my ministry” (2 Timothy 4: 11)

THEREFORE the session of Parkwood Church, Ottawa humbly overtures the Venerable, the One hundred and forty-sixth General Assembly of The Presbyterian Church in Canada, to propose and initiate a restructuring of The Presbyterian Church in Canada designed (1) to bring together as one synod those ministers, sessions, congregations, and presbyteries holding the present confessed doctrine of marriage defined as the union of one man and one woman and who affirm that those eligible for ordination as either elders or ministers are expected to teach and to practice no other definition of marriage; and (2) to permit ministers, sessions, congregations and presbyteries who wish to hold and practice a different doctrine of marriage defined as the union of two adult persons and who affirm that those eligible for ordination as either elders or ministers may teach and practice such a definition of marriage be brought together as a separate synod; thus enabling two synods to be constituted, each with ministers, sessions, congregations, and presbyteries mutually accountable within their respective ecclesiastical frameworks; both synods to share in the present resources of The Presbyterian Church in Canada and to co- operate where common cause is affirmed or can be found and affirmed, in the furtherance of Christian witness, while preserving with integrity confessional fidelity and presbyterial polity; or to do otherwise as the General Assembly in its wisdom deems best.

Cote des Neiges Overture re: Non-Geographic Presbyteries

WHEREAS the Presbyterian Church in Canada has accepted the reality that it is deeply divided on the issues surrounding human sexuality; and

WHEREAS protracted study and conversation on the issue have not revolved the differences and are unlikely to at any point in the future; and

WHEREAS some within the church see the push to full and complete inclusion as a human rights issue that must be eventually accomplished at all costs; and

WHEREAS others have clearly indicated that they cannot remain in a church that no longer makes room for what they believe to the non-negotiable historic orthodox understanding of the Scriptures; and

WHEREAS a division within the church would risk putting both those that leave and those who remain in positions where key administrative functions and valued ministries would become unviable; and

WHEREAS the best alternative to a paralyzing and destructive division at this point is a restructuring that would allow for shared administrative functions and collaborative ministries,  combined with the freedom for local congregations to align and collaborate more closely along doctrinal lines and convictions rather than geography; and

WHEREAS other denominations have successfully implemented non-geographic presbyteries; and

WHEREAS the current pandemic crisis has already pushed us to harness technology in ways that have eliminated geographic distance as a hurdle to shared ministry and collaboration; and

WHEREAS several of the Presbyterian Church in Canada’s existing geographically based presbyteries have already declined to the point of unviability and need to be redrawn; and

WHEREAS the Han-Ca East and Han-Ca West presbyteries already provide a robust test case of the feasibility of non-geographic presbyteries overlapping collaboratively with other presbyteries within the bounds of the Presbyterian Church in Canada; and

THEREFORE, the session of Cote des Neiges Presbyterian Church, humbly overtures the Venerable, the 146th General Assembly mandate a committee that will research the issue and prepare for the 147th General Assembly, recommendations for the restructuring of the Presbyterian Church in Canada into non geographic presbyteries in such a way that

  • local congregations are given full liberty of conscience and action is matters relating to human sexuality,
  • existing geographic presbyteries that have declined below the point of viability are redrawn
  • we can preserve and maintain vital administrative functions (like the pension plan, the trustee board, etc.) and key shared ministries (like PWS&D, Presbyterians Sharing, the summer camps, etc.)

St. Edward’s Beauharnois Overture re: Theologically Based Presbyteries And Synods

WHEREAS the Presbyterian Church in Canada has long devoted time and resources to studying and debating the matter of LGBTQI sexuality diverting energy away from other important issues; and

WHEREAS the debate on this one issue has revealed a larger theological division within the P.C.C., as is evident in the report from the 2019 General Assembly’s “Special Committee Regarding Implications of Option B (Inclusion)” which read in part, “In truth we differ theologically on many things; the role of scripture, the virgin birth, the resurrection, the place of children, of women and the priorities of the church…”; and

WHEREAS many serious attempts to resolve these divisions have failed to do so as is evident from deep pain being expressed on both sides; and

WHEREAS the smooth functioning of our courts require collegial relationships between members; and

WHEREAS any outcome of Remits B and C (GA 2019) after the 2020 General Assembly will not reconcile the two unbridgeable theological views regarding the basis of authority, resulting in courts prone to conflict; and

WHEREAS it appears that Remits B and C, as adopted at the 145th General Assembly, were intended to provide an inclusive framework to bridge these differences, but for many in our denomination do not effectively do so; and

WHEREAS a change in doctrine may lead to members abandoning their church, thereby reducing the viability of many congregations; and

WHEREAS Remits B and C (GA 2019) do not safeguard civil and ecclesiastical liability for members holding to the traditional view; and

WHEREAS every member of the P.C.C. desires a place to stand with integrity within our own denomination; and

WHEREAS the P.C.C. already has geographically overlapping presbyteries,

THEREFORE the Session of St. Edward’s Presbyterian Church Beauharnois, does humbly overture the 2021 General Assembly to mandate the formation of overlapping, theologically based, presbyteries and synods, allowing sessions to choose which courts their congregations would affiliate with, or to do otherwise as the General Assembly in its wisdom may deem best.

Grace Orleans Overture re: Limiting the Agenda

WHEREAS the remits under the Barrier Act of 2019 seek to change the doctrine and practices of The Presbyterian Church in Canada in foundational ways, and

WHEREAS through no fault of its own, and in order to respect public health regulations and intentions due to COVID-19 issues, the Presbyterian Church in Canada was unable to conduct a General Assembly in 2020, and to consider the results of Remits B and C (2019) as it normally would, and

WHEREAS The Presbyterian Church in Canada prides itself on being inclusive, and

WHEREAS Assembly Council has decided to move forward with a digital General Assembly in 2021 which will exclude participation of important Commissioner voices of those who do not have the computer skills, equipment, or the effective high speed internet connection, likely including those who live in rural areas, and those who may be more mature, less-educated, and financially challenged, and

WHEREAS the potential for technical challenges to an online meeting are high,  many have experienced large group disruptive or ineffective videoconference meetings, particularly with acknowledging and allowing individual speakers to have their turn, glitches and difficulty in determining close votes, and other basic requirements frustrated by the media being used, and

WHEREAS these frustrations will be exacerbated by over two hundred commissioners attempting to have their voices and votes, heard and considered, and

WHEREAS the results of Remits B and C (2019) deserve complete and comprehensive consideration and debate which cannot be done as effectively on-line, and

WHEREAS the on-going work of the General Assembly needs to be attended to,

THEREFORE the Session of Grace Presbyterian Church, Orleans hereby overtures the next General Assembly to limit the business brought before the General Assembly in 2021 to matters normally brought forward under the “Consent Agenda” and other non-contentious matters; and that specifically the matter of Remits B and C (2019) be postponed until such a time as General Assembly is able to meet face to face to allow for due process, or to do otherwise as General Assembly in its wisdom may deem best.

Grace West Hill Overture re: Gracious Dismissal

To the Venerable the General Assembly:

WHEREAS the Book of Forms has constituted the guide by which the business of the General Assembly has been conducted within the Presbyterian Church in Canada since its inception; and

WHEREAS it has not been our practice, and should not be our practice, to intentionally delay items of business properly brought before the General Assembly; and

WHEREAS committees assigned work by one General Assembly traditionally report to the following General Assembly or, having made a genuine effort, seek permission to report to a subsequent General Assembly; and

WHEREAS the matter commonly known as Gracious Dismissal was first presented to the 141st General Assembly in 2015; and

WHEREAS the matter was additionally addressed by many overtures in both the 142nd and 143rd General Assemblies, as well as the report of the Clerks of Assembly at both gatherings; and

WHEREAS the 143rd General Assembly named a Special Committee to consider the complex dynamics of the reports and overtures, and in the end committed the recommendations of the Special Committee to the Clerks of Assembly for further consultation; and

WHEREAS the 144th General Assembly during the discussion of the report of the Clerks of Assembly on this matter decided to refer it back, not to the Clerks, but to the Assembly Council; and

WHEREAS the Assembly Council at its March 2019 meeting appointed a task force of its members to prepare a response for consideration; and

WHEREAS that task force response was presented to the October 2020 meeting of the Assembly Council in order to consider and prepare a response to the next General Assembly; and

WHEREAS, at the October 2020 meeting, Assembly Council refused to do its duty to the Church — to receive and consider the Task Force report, thereby disregarding, demeaning and disrespecting the will of the 144th General Assembly, the long-established practice of the denomination, the legitimate concerns of the authors of the overtures and petitions and the dedicated work of some of its own members, while ignoring the history of this matter which predates by four years Remits B and C from 2019; and

WHEREAS such action creates an unfortunate precedent by which a small number of well-placed individuals exercised excessive control over the affairs of the denomination; and

WHEREAS the failure of the General Assembly to chart a clear path forward may quite possibly lead to a flurry of costly alternate responses and legal actions across the country; and

WHEREAS other denominations in several countries have already proven that a gracious path forward in such cases is not only possible, but also desirable; and

WHEREAS the prospect of General Assembly’s possible change to the theology of our denomination by approving remits “B” and “C” without providing any options for people who, in good conscience, cannot abide with such change, will create unnecessary bitterness and conflict within the denomination;

THEREFORE, the Session of Grace West Hill Presbyterian Church, Toronto, Ontario humbly overtures the Venerable, the 146th General Assembly to receive the report of the Gracious Dismissal task force as found on pages 1363-1372 of the October 27, 2020 Assembly Council minutes and to consider the recommendations found within that report
or to do otherwise as the General Assembly in its wisdom may deem best.

St. Andrew’s Moncton Overture re: Restructuring Along Theological Lines

WHEREAS The Presbyterian Church in Canada has debated human sexuality for several decades, and

WHEREAS the debate is a distraction to our mission, undermining our effectiveness, and

WHEREAS the issues pertaining to human sexuality are symptomatic of deeper theological issues, and

WHEREAS the theological divide is evidenced in the report from the 2019 General Assembly’s “Special Committee Regarding Implications of Option B (Inclusion)” which read in part, “In truth we differ theologically on many things; the role of scripture, the virgin birth, the resurrection, the place of children, of women and the priorities of the church…,” and

WHEREAS deviation from a traditional interpretation of scripture regarding marriage and the ordination practices of the church separates the PCC from the one Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church and the majority of churches around the world, and

WHEREAS Remits B and C (GA 2019) are in and of themselves divisive, and

WHEREAS the activism of some on behalf of the LGBTQI community creates a working environment prone to conflict, and

WHEREAS there is a deep love and devotion to the PCC and its system of governance and traditional theology with many in the denomination, and

WHEREAS our system of governance cannot function without a common basis of authority, and

WHEREAS regardless of how Remits B and C (GA 2019) are dealt with, there remains an unbridgeable chasm of difference within the denomination disrupting unity within the PCC,

THEREFORE the Session of St. Andrew’s Moncton humbly Overtures the 146th General Assembly of The Presbyterian Church in Canada to restructure the denomination along two theological lines, one theologically autonomous Synod each along traditional and revisionist lines, with General Assembly and national offices activities being limited to human resource matters such as pension, health and dental; mission and relief activities; and other mutually agreed upon activities and interests; allowing each Session to choose which Synod their congregation would affiliate with; or to do otherwise as the General Assembly in its wisdom may deem best.

St. Andrew’s Moncton Overture re: a Limited 2021 Online General Assembly

WHEREAS the Barrier Act of 2019 seeks to change the doctrine and practices of The Presbyterian Church in Canada in foundational ways, and

WHEREAS The Presbyterian Church in Canada prides itself in doing things ‘decently and in good order,’ and

WHEREAS, through no fault of its own, The Presbyterian Church in Canada has been unable to conduct a General Assembly in 2020, and to consider the results of Remits B and C (2019) as it normally would have due to COVID 19 issues, and

WHEREAS The Presbyterian Church in Canada prides itself on being inclusive, and

WHEREAS, Assembly Council, in its wisdom, has decided to move forward with a digital General Assembly in 2021 which will exclude participation of Commissioners who do not have access to effective digital means; and

WHEREAS, the results of Remits B and C (2019) deserve complete and comprehensive consideration and debate which cannot be done as effectively on-line, and

WHEREAS the on-going work of the General Assembly needs to be attended to:

THEREFORE, the Session of St. Andrew’s Moncton would Overture the next General Assembly to limit the business brought before the General Assembly in 2021 to matters normally brought forward under the “Consent Agenda” and other non-contentious matters; and that specifically the matter  of Remits B and C (2019) be postponed until such a time as General Assembly is able to meet face to face to allow for due process, or to do otherwise as General Assembly in its wisdom may deem best.