Living Hope: A Day of Encouragement and Renewal

Videos on this page:

Rev. Dr. Dale Woods: “Six Stages of Faith” – experiences of faith throughout life.
Kristy Short of Alpha Canada: “Engaging evangelism in a COVID World”.
Rev. Dr. Christine O’Reilly: “Salt and Light” – church court strategies post-Remits.
Rev. Doug Cameron and Rev. Cathi Cameron: “Grieving to live” – engaging loss to regain vitality.
Rev. Dr. Esther Acolatse: “Recovering the joy – rekindling the hope”.
Shane Davis and Jon Dykeman: “Youth/young adult ministry – how to engage and encourage.”
Cory McKenna of The Cross Current: “How do we walk as followers of Christ in an increasingly secular world?”

Living HopeOn November 13, 2021, approximately 100 people participated in our day of encouragement and renewal. This in itself was encouraging! It was a day of worship, prayer, teaching, and discussion organized in partnership with Vaughan Community Church (VCC), an Eastern Han-Ca congregation.

Main Session Video

Introduction by Rev. Andy Cornellbegins 38 seconds in
Worship led by Ken Michellbegins 9:42 minutes in
Greetings from Rev. Dr. Dan Scott, Moderator of the PCC – begins 34:24 minutes in
Keynote speaker, Rev. Dr. Dale Woods, Presbyter of Vision and Mission for the Presbytery of Westminster and former principal of Presbyterian College Montreal. His presentation, “Six Stages of Faith,” was an exploration of personal levels or experiences of faith throughout life, augmented by video clips, music, and small-group discussion. The following video begins with Dr. Woods’ address, 42:37 minutes in.
Six breakout workshops – The six videos are presented on their own following the Main Session Video below.

Workshops

We were similarly blessed with six gifted workshop leaders.
Kristy Short of Alpha Canada: “Engaging evangelism in a COVID World, which has been turned upside down.”


Rev. Dr. Christine O’Reilly: “Salt and Light – church court strategies post-Remits “B” and “C” – pragmatic ways to uphold the Scriptures and the Book of Forms.”


Rev. Doug Cameron and Rev. Cathi Cameron: “Grieving to live – many of us need to engage the loss in order to regain vitality to minister.”


Rev. Dr. Esther Acolatse, Professor of Pastoral Theology and Intercultural Studies, Knox College, Toronto, Ontario: “Recovering the joy – many of us are feeling beaten down, so how do we rekindle the hope?”


Youth pastors Shane Davis from Lakeshore St. Andrew’s, Windsor, Ontario, and Jon Dykeman from St. Andrew’s, Moncton, New Brunswick – “Youth/young adult ministry – how to engage and encourage.”


Cory McKenna of The Cross Current: “Whither our culture – how do we walk as followers of Christ in an increasingly secular world?”

Joo Hyun Chung, of Vaughan Community Church, and Rev. Jin-sook Khang, Associate Pastor at VCC, were busy behind the scenes
Joo Hyun Chung, of Vaughan Community Church, and Rev. Jin-sook Khang, Associate Pastor at VCC, were busy behind the scenes.
Rev. John Park, a member of the RF board, was our tech host.
Rev. John Park, a member of the RF board, was our tech host

Here’s some participant feedback:

“The conference was excellent. I enjoyed it all and was blessed.”

“The presentations were excellent, needed and on target.”

“Opening worship a good start to the day. Dale: really inspired by this and look forward to reviewing his slides. Was assigned to Christine O’Reilly’s workshop and found her insights very helpful.”

“Thanks so much to you, the organizing team, and Vaughan Community Church for a wonderful day of encouragement yesterday. It was good to gather together with other PCC folk on the more traditional side of the denomination, to know that we are not alone in the struggle within our denomination.”

“The enthusiasm of Kristy Short was contagious!

“Whither our Culture workshop was a very good presentation in that it helped open our eyes to the challenges of sharing the gospel in our culture today.”

“It was wonderful. The entire event was excellent in every way. I feel encouraged and strengthened. Thank you!”

“This was a great day. Yes do this again.”

“All portions of the opening worship were inspiring. It was good to have the moderator deliver remarks and the laying of hands and prayer for him were most appropriate.”

“Really liked the leader for the worship – excellent song choices – really felt drawn into meaningful worship – thank you so much! Should we do something like this again? Definitely – the coast to coast attendance is very good.”

Good things to know about Renewal

New director: Rev. Meridyth Robertson, of Trail, British Columbia, joined the board as of October 30, 2021. Her profile will appear in a future edition.

Let’s get together: Renewal Fellowship’s next annual meeting will take place on April 30, 2022. Location/method (online or in person) TBA.

Extraordinary support: Over the past 24 months, Renewal has been blessed with federal grants of $46,000 and two bequests totalling $100,000.

Generosity: We have been blessed with congregational gifts that have more than compensated for underruns in individual gifts and memberships.

Precarious existence: Renewal now has a cash reserve of about $91,000. Without the extraordinary support, we would be $55,000 in the red. Regular donations (our lifeblood) are not meeting our carefully managed expenses. Please consider how your congregation can support Renewal as a mission, and how you can support Renewal through regular giving or a bequest.

Prayer: We publish a new prayer 365 days a year in either print or email formats. Please share prayer requests to rfprayer@gmail.com.

Care: Executive Director Rev. Andy Cornell is always eager to bring words of prayer and encouragement to congregations and sessions in person or virtually. Contact him at amcpastor1@gmail.com.

Remit Response Survey

Along with the quarterly e-mailout of the Renewal News and Prayer Calendar, sent the last week of September, we included a survey, asking respondents to share their responses to the adoption of remits ‘B’ and ‘C.’

We received 21 responses:

  • Ministers        12
  • Elders              5
  • Members        3
  • Adherents      1

Responses arrived from Vancouver Island to Newfoundland and included some non-Anglo representation (but not a lot).

The results:

Personal response to the adoption of the Remits (check all that apply):

  1. I am staying in my congregation — 6 ministers, 4 elders, 1 member
  2. I am waiting to see what the next General Assembly enacts – 6 ministers, 3 elders, 1 member
  3. I am looking for another denomination – 3 ministers, 1 elder, 1 member
  4. I have already left for another denomination – 1 minister (retired),
  5. I am seeking the Spirit’s wisdom – 3 ministers, 3 elders, 2 members, 1 adherent

Other personal courses of action:

Minister (West Toronto):The Clerk and I have passed along the info from General Assembly, but he we have not discussed the remits with the Session or Congregation over the past couple years at all. It may be a little of ‘head in the sand’ situation – perhaps not the best approach, but that is where we have happily been plugging along for years now.”

Minister (Oak Ridges): “I believe the GA made a poor decision preceded by poor process. However, if one just keeps working in their own congregation and acting in their own conscience, we could lower the rhetoric considerably.”

Minister (Barrie): “My congregation is traditional but vacant. I am retired and Minister-in-Association. If the congregation moves from its traditional position or calls a progressive as minister I will leave it and possibly the PCC.”

Adherent (Brampton): “When it became apparent that the Remits were likely to be adopted (as it turned out they were), I asked Session to strike my name from the nominal roll of members, and to tolerate me as an adherent if they cared to. I wish not to be a member of the PCC any longer. I feel that it has left me, and I have not forsaken it. The congregation of which I am now a mere adherent seems likely to go the way of the PCC – theologically and corporately dying. If I could hear of a congregation and denomination likely to uphold the beliefs and standards that used to be those of the PCC, I would want to explore the possibility of affiliating myself with it and supporting it; I haven’t heard of anything along those lines yet. I acknowledge that there are some congregations and denominations that I don’t consider seriously because I find their worship practices to be so deliberately distasteful and/ or disrespectful as to distract me from any involvement at all.”

Member (Hamilton): “I would like to stay with my congregation, but not if it stays with PCC.”

Minister (Barrie): “I am currently between charges and am not sure if I want to seek a new call within the PCC as I am concerned personally about the impact of the remits on my ordination vows.”

Minister retired (Pickering): “Preaching is irrelevant in present congregation, attending Northpoint by live stream, attend [congregation] by Zoom only to keep in touch with old friends.”

Elder (Ottawa): “Organizing a meeting of likeminded sessions to worship, pray, share perspectives and seek the Lord’s will.”

Minister (Montreal): “A schism seems inevitable. But leaving before all avenues of recourse have been exhausted is a betrayal of our ordination vows.”

Minister (Calgary-MacLeod): “We will not surrender our assets and property for the Presbytery to potential start another revisionist church as our legacy in our community.”

Elder (New Brunswick): “My wife and I will not be staying in the PCC with the adoption of remits, so staying in my congregation applies only if congregational action is taken after next GA, depending on what action that is.”

Member (Westminster): “I am part of a congregation who are tackling the issue through discussion and discernment but with a strong focus on the Word of God being the basis for how to live as Christians in a secular world. I will be waiting, along with our congregation, on future outcomes of General Assembly before making any decision on whether to leave or stay in the Presbyterian denomination.”

Elder (Quebec): “I have chosen to stay within the PCC. The testimony of the Rev. Dr. Greg Brawn, guest speaker for Renewal Day 2021, has impacted and encouraged me to be a voice of orthodoxy within our church and denomination. Graeme Lauber of Journey Canada has also influenced my decision to remain and love those who are struggling with same-sex attraction. I know I am not alone in my walk in the PCC, and I am very grateful for the men and women of the Renewal Fellowship that make it possible for us to meet together and pray for one another. I have also signed the RF PCC Covenant.
I am always seeking the Spirit’s guidance and wisdom, and pray for the PCC, Renewal Fellowship, and our little denomination . . . . God is still working, and may open a door in creating a sister denomination. If that be the case, I will be leaving the PCC.”

Elder (Kamloops): “I am ashamed to be a member of the PCC. The only reason I am still here is because my minister and session are committed followers of Jesus Christ. My church and the local CRC church are the only Reformed voices in town, so here I remain, for now. I do not expect the conversation regarding “gracious dismissal” to bear any fruit, but I will support any effort to find another denomination to join, or even create a new one.”

Congregational response to the adoption of the Remits (check all that apply):

  1. We are intending to stay within the PCC and support it – 3 ministers, 1 elder, 1 member
  2. We are waiting to see what the next General Assembly enacts – 2 ministers, 3 elders
  3. Our congregation is divided. We don’t know what we will do – 1 elder, 1 member
  4. Our congregation has little awareness of the seriousness of the Remit decisions – 3 ministers, 2 elders
  5. We will likely close in the near future.
  6. We have decided to leave the PCC with or without a gracious dismissal option – 1 minister (Eastern Han-Ca), 1 elder (New Brunswick)

 Other courses of action not listed above:

Adherent (Brampton): “The congregation of which I have become an adherent, lifting my lines from membership in it and thus in the PCC, is, to anyone who has eyes to see, demographically moribund. Moreover, it fails to fulfill a great deal of the proper role and functions of a congregation. I’m 86 years old, but it’s a toss-up which of us will die first.”

Elder (Ottawa): “Our church held several informational meetings and then voted to oppose the changes on human sexuality. Session recently reconfirmed their stand in a letter to the congregation.”

Elder (New Brunswick): “Session has adopted options 2 and 6, but there has been no congregational vote. I feel that options 1, 3 and 4 apply to parts of the congregation,
so session has work to do before a congregational vote on option 6.”

Elder (Kamloops): “The last response – We have decided to leave the PCC with or without a gracious dismissal option – is very close to where I would choose to go.
Currently, there is no way our congregation will surrender our building and assets to the national church. We will refuse to support our national office in every way we can.”

Member (Lanark-Renfrew): “I am an elder [Retired] I’m not sure where our session stands right now, but my family is waiting to see and if there isn’t a strong response, my family will be looking at moving to another Church. We do have options. However St. Andrew’s is a Bible based church and I’m sure there will be a strong response by our session and that’s the only reason we’re still here.”

Please share briefly any additional thought you may have on this issue:

Minister (West Toronto): “I appreciate the prayerful responses and pray that somehow God will bring good out of this situation. I believe the evil one does delight in the pain, division, and loss of Church connection that this issue has caused.
with hope in Christ.”

Minister (Oak Ridges): There is no gracious dismissal option at the moment … and no need to seek other denominational shelter as people care very little about denominational ties. So for the time being … staying put.”

Adherent (Brampton):  “If you’d care to hear what I think are the ‘proper role and functions of a congregation’ (a phrase I use in the answer above) let me know. I don’t mind identifying myself. [NOTE: Renewal Fellowship has invited him to share his thoughts; stay tuned.]

Minister currently without charge (Barrie): “Unless the denomination can separate into two theological streams I do not believe that it will be possible for me to follow my call in the PCC.”

Minister retired (Pickering): “It seems irrelevant/inconsequential/invisible/insignificant to congregation. Opinion of minister and session unknown.”

Elder (Ottawa): “There is no middle ground; some people are leaving because of the denominational stance while others are leaving because of the church’s stance.”

Minister (Montreal): “We, the dissenters of the current PCC doctrinal swing, spent so much time (understandably) in organising resistance that we did not develop fully how faithful to respond to a social situation radically different from that found in the societies of the New and Old Testament.”

Elder (Quebec): “Recently I was elected as elder, and tomorrow, October 3rd, I will be ordained. The PCC’s remits have been weighing heavy on my mind. At a session with the elders, I raised my concerns with the remits, and where we should stand as a church, and where I should stand as an elder; as I do not want to create any divisiveness within our church. A kingdom divided cannot stand. My concerns were brushed aside after a long and uncomfortable silence. One elder eventually said that the situation was very complex, and God is working, and we will revisit this question at a later date. That was that.”

Minister, retired (Vancouver Island): “I find this action of the last General Assembly having a painful disengaging affect on me. I have done all I can to remain with in the PCC through working on restructuring proposals. In June the Assembly voted ‘no’ to investigating such ideas. It appears that our days of negotiating are over! Therefore I find myself looking for a new church family.”

  • Questions developed by Robin Ross. Responses collated/organized by Andy Cornell

Renewal News

Download the entire Issue of Renewal News in PDF format.

In the current issue of Renewal News:

Special Committee Pastoral Letter

PCC Logo

July 28, 2021

To the people and congregations of The Presbyterian Church in Canada,

The 2021 General Assembly appointed a special committee to listen to concerns identified by petitions from the Presbyteries of Eastern Han-Ca and Western Han-Ca. The petitions state “we have experienced treatment at the hands of many in The Presbyterian Church in Canada which has caused us much pain and raises alarm, for we have collectively experienced many instances of slander, ridicule, racism”. The petitions challenge The Presbyterian Church in Canada to reflect on the ways “the dominant culture of the denomination” might again be “following in the hegemonic sins of their ancestors”. The authors of the petitions believe that they, as Koreans, are not alone in these experiences and ask for the General Assembly to confess the mistreatment of “the large ethnic contingent of our denomination” done “by the dominant culture of our denomination”.

In response to these serious words, the Assembly named a nine-member special committee. The members are: the Rev. Sampson Afoakwah, the Rev. Peter Bush, the Rev. Mary Fontaine, the Rev. Joon Ki Kim, the Rev. Stephen Kwon, the Rev. Linda Park, the Rev. Dr. Daniel Scott, the Rev. Frank Szatmari and the Rev. Sean Seungho Lee. At its first meeting, the committee named the Rev. Linda Park and the Rev. Peter Bush as co-conveners.

The purpose of this letter is to do three things.

1. To let the church at large know that we exist and have begun our work. We will be reporting to the 2022 General Assembly.

2. To invite stories about how members of the ethnic contingent of The Presbyterian Church in Canada have been treated by members of the dominant culture of The Presbyterian Church in Canada. We wish to hear from people in “ethnic” congregations. We also wish to hear from people of non-Euro-Canadian descent who are part of congregations whose members are largely from the dominant culture. As well, we would like to hear from clergy of non-Euro-Canadian descent who cross-culturally serve congregations whose members are drawn from the dominant culture.

a. We have an e-mail address: to which people can submit their stories in writing.

b. We also hope that congregations and groups across the church will invite us to come and hear their stories. It is our hope that we will be able to hear those stories in-person. However, with COVID-19 restrictions, we may need to use Zoom (or a similar technology).

c. We anticipate developing ways in which we can gather stories from individuals.

Please contact us through the e-mail address above to invite us to visit your congregation or group to hear stories. Please contact us if you have personal stories you would like to tell us verbally. We will do our best to hear from as many people as possible. We plead for patience and understanding as we set up our processes. As the timelines are very tight to make the deadline of reporting to the 2022 General Assembly, the earlier the invitation is sent to us the more likely that we will be able to accept it.

3. We need your prayers. Please pray for the members of the committee: for resilience and stamina, for sensitivity and discernment. Pray for those telling their stories: for the courage to tell their stories and the comfort of the Holy Spirit even as the stories may be hard to tell. Pray for the church as whole that this process will lead to understanding, hope, and a renewed commitment to the vision of the church described in Revelation 7:9: “a great multitude that no one could count from every nation, tribe, people and language”.

We thank the church for the trust it has placed in us. If there are questions or comments, please use our e-mail address.

In Christ

On behalf of the Special Committee

The Rev. Linda Park, Co-convener
The Rev. Peter Bush, Co-convener

Renewal_News_Summer_2021
Download the Summer 2021 issue of Renewal News in PDF format.

In this issue:

Trusting God Enough

By Rev. Denise Allen-Macartney

Lately, I have been reading the Old Testament book of Numbers; not always riveting prose. Yet God often catches me unawares. Today was one of those moments.

In Numbers 20:1-13, the people are at Kadesh in the desert of Zin. Miriam has just died and been buried. There is a drought. No water to drink. No water to wash with. No water to cook in. Not surprisingly, the people are frustrated. I’d be frustrated too. I would probably complain loudly. In this case, the people congregate together—the way groups congregate for worship—but they gather in angry protest.

This is, by my counting, the sixth time in Numbers that people rebel against Moses, and/or God. On every previous occasion, God has responded with swift judgement. Plague, snakes, fire, earthquake: God has levied heavy consequences on people who rebelled.

As before, Moses goes directly to the tent of meeting. He prostrates himself before God. And God answers: not in fury, not in vengeance, but in grace. “Take your staff,” he tells Moses. “Gather the people. Speak to the rock before their eyes, and it will pour out its water.”

Moses goes and does exactly what God says. He takes his staff, and gathers the people at the rock. But! Then Moses’ frustration and anger spew out. He berates the people. “Listen, you rebels!” he yells. “Must we bring you water out of this rock?” He raises his staff in fury, and strikes the rock, twice.

There is water. Plenty of water. But there is also judgment, on Moses!

I have long found this story puzzling. Why does God get so angry with Moses? After all Moses has done for so many years? Remember when God first called Moses, and Moses embarked on an impossible quest? Moses confronted Pharaoh. Moses trusted God, and he led these fractious people. For weeks. Months. Years. On several occasions, when God, himself, became angry with the people, Moses interceded for them.

But now, at the very last, God declares that Moses will not be allowed to enter the Promised Land. God says to Moses: “Because you did not trust in me enough to honour me as holy in the sight of the Israelites….”

Ronald B. Allen offers helpful insights. Is Moses disappointed with God’s failure to respond in wrath to the rebellious people, as God had in the past? “It is almost as though Moses thought it was necessary to do the work of vengeance himself.” So, Moses responds with “harsh, condemnatory words, sarcasm, and blows against the rock.”

And what does Torah insist about vengeance? “‘Vengeance is mine; I will repay’ says the Lord.” This time, for God’s own reasons, and God’s own purposes, God offers grace.

But Moses finds grace unacceptable. Maybe his ego smarts from the people’s angry blame, and his patience is worn to a frazzle because of his own parched thirst. He’s had enough.

Yet God doesn’t agree. God says, “You didn’t trust in me….” Moses, himself, didn’t trust God. Moses was not willing to let God deal with the people.

When Moses struck the rock instead of speaking to it, “he in some way dishonoured God’s holiness,” says Allen.

Psalm 95 remembers this troubling event. “Today, if you hear his voice, do not harden your hearts as you did at Meribah….” From God’s perspective, Moses, too, hardened his heart toward God!

Psalm 95 also remembers the rock. “Come, let us sing for joy to the Lord; let us shout aloud to the Rock of our salvation….” In some way, that Rock at Kadesh in the desert is the symbol of God’s gracious provision. God’s own presence. God’s shelter, refuge, and tower for his people.

The Apostle Paul remembers the rock, and the water it released. In 1 Corinthians 10:4, Paul says the rock was King Jesus himself! It seems that Messiah himself slaked the people’s thirst with his own living water.

So, when Moses, in anger and frustration at the rebels, raised his solid wooden staff and whacked it hard against that rock, Moses was lashing out against the embodiment of God’s grace. Moses was lashing out against Messiah—God’s own gift of forgiveness and provision and company.

I ponder this story alongside our present struggle in the Presbyterian Church. Some may view the words and actions of others in our denomination as rebellion against God’s Word, God’s call—God’s holiness, even. Well. It is a challenging season. The way forward is not clear. People are frustrated with COVID, frustrated with the hard work of navigating conflict and making wise decisions. We are thirsty. Restless.

What do I hear in this poignant story of Moses’ own greatest sorrow, his lasting regret?

I notice God’s grace. Only God’s gracious faithfulness to his covenant sustains his people (even when his people are faithless). As a Church, we are sustained only by God’s gracious presence. If the Church is disobedient or rebellious, can we trust God himself to respond? In Numbers 20, as in so many instances, God acts with remarkable grace toward his people. Could we live with that?

Perhaps it is not up to us to take drastic action. Maybe we are simply called to speak.

At Kadesh, the Rock was the embodiment of God’s presence. In our day, the Church is the embodiment of King Jesus. When we strike the church, we strike Jesus. When we would act to split the church, we wound Jesus.

The rash words of Moses were an act of rebellion against God’s Spirit. Moses thought he was directing those words at the grumbling, faithless people, but God heard them as dishonouring to himself!

Jesus loves his Church. Jesus is not under any illusions about how faithful, or pure, or wise we are. Yet, on the night before he died (… for whom was he preparing to die? For his feckless disciples, who were about to abandon him; for God’s chosen people of Israel, who had rejected him; for the Roman soldiers who abused and executed him, for us, even us, for those with whom we disagree, and for our clueless neighbours who don’t know Jesus at all.) On the night before he died, Jesus prayed for his Church.

What was his great prayer? That we would be one. That God himself would protect us from the evil one. That we would love one another. That we would forgive one another, as he forgives us. That we would show his love and grace to the world. Lord, let not my words, nor my actions, contradict your dying prayer! Let me not strike your church. Let me not dishonour your holiness by lacking trust in you.

Here’s what I hear in the story of Moses: I need to honour the holiness of God. I need to trust him, even when I’m frustrated, weary, thirsty. I need to trust God with the future of his Church. I need to honour God’s own sovereignty, his right to respond with discipline and grace, as he chooses.

I need to speak—to speak the words God gives to me. And to speak them in the manner Jesus has clearly instructed: to speak the truth, in love. To bless, and not to curse.

I need to honour the death and life, and the prayer of Jesus for his Church. In what ways? By keeping my words full of grace. By acting to strengthen and bless his church—even when I am frustrated by people in his church.

O King Jesus, strengthen my faith in You. Make me an agent of Your grace. Amen.

Rev. Denise Allen-Macartney is minister of Gloucester Presbyterian Church in Ottawa, Ontario. This reflection was originally presented at a meeting of the Praying, Listening, Trusting group via Zoom on April 20, 2021.

PCC Covenant

Diversity in Paths, Unity in Spirit

A word to those within The Presbyterian Church in Canada who consider themselves Evangelical, Conservative, Orthodox, or Traditional:

There is much that unites us: we worship and serve the same Lord, we hold the same convictions about the inspiration and authority of the Scriptures, and we seek to order our lives and our ministries under the authority of our sovereign God and His revealed Word.

Different circumstances will lead us to follow Christ faithfully in different directions, and none of these directions is a better or worse calling than another.

  • Some of us feel called to stay within the denomination and support the denomination.
  • Some of us feel called to seek theological separation within the denomination.
  • Some of us feel called to leave the denomination.
  • Some of us feel called to wait and pray rather than deciding upon any direction at this time.

The Lord will strengthen us if we come together as one body in Christ — we invite you to participate in an ongoing series of virtual townhall meetings.

Our purpose is to provide a place where we:

  • worship together at the feet of Jesus, and build our fellowship,
  • share specifics about chosen directions,
  • support each other within each chosen direction,
  • support those called to other chosen directions, and
  • discuss how to overcome any opposition.

This might include – but not be limited to – prayer, fellowship, encouragement and sharing of knowledge.

The overriding desire and intent is to be right with the Lord throughout this turbulent time.

Full details about the covenant can be found at pcc-covenant.ca/our-covenant/.

Eastern and Western Han-Ca Petitions re: Racism and Marginalization

Editor’s Note: These Han-Ca petitions have been supported by a letter from the Chinese Consultation, composed of six congregations – Vancouver, Montreal, Toronto, Markham, Mississauga, and Celebration Chinese Presbyterian Churches, and by a letter from Chapel Place, an Arabic-speaking congregation.

To the Venerable 146th General Assembly of The Presbyterian Church in Canada,

The Presbytery of Eastern Han-Ca and the Presbytery of Western Han-Ca question whether in this denomination we are nothing more than a marginal group whose voice is deemed as one which can, and should be ignored. This is no less clearly evident in our current debates regarding human sexuality and the lack of response to our serious concerns surrounding the recently proposed recommendations to change our doctrine and practice of ministry. Because we are not willing to abdicate our beliefs, which cohere with the vast majority of the global church, in favour of that which is promulgated by the dominant culture in our denomination, we have not only experienced a silencing, but much mistreatment, and therefore wish to petition The 146th General Assembly to confess their sins to the large ethnic contingent, Koreans being but one group, of our denomination and repent of its treatment of ethnic congregations in this denomination by also acknowledging that we are as well, equally, the Presbyterian Church in Canada.

WHEREAS the vast majority of congregations from both the presbyteries of Eastern Han-Ca and Western Han-Ca are questioning if there is a place for us in this denomination, and also whether those not holding to the agendas and adopted ideologies of the Western, primarily Anglo-driven, dominant culture are really welcomed, and

WHEREAS Eastern and Western Han-Ca presbyteries are extremely alarmed, not only because of the specific nature of the recommendations being handed down to change our doctrine, but more so due to the manner in which those who seek change have been attempting to do so, and what this trajectory of change indicates about the nature of our denomination, for we believe we are moving in a direction that betrays our longstanding theological beliefs and practices of ministry, as indicated in our subordinate standards, and

WHEREAS in the PCC many are seeking to redefine our relationship to our subordinate standards, and in similar fashion our scriptures, which in practice seems more like promoting or adhering to only that which we deem as amicable to us; or often repeatedly invoking the claim of relativity of interpretation so as to make it impossible for our subordinate standards and scriptures to function as that which we can subordinate ourselves to, or uphold as authority, and

WHEREAS if in the PCC we see the increasing erosion of the unity, clear-direction, and purpose that our subordinate standards and scriptures once provided, what now serves as their replacement and is able to again bring us together? In The Presbyterian Church in Canada (PCC) are our subordinate standards and scriptures now subordinated to the loud moral clarion calls of justice, the contents of which are dictated to us by our Politically Correct Culture (PCC’)? and

WHEREAS since those in the Han-Ca Presbyteries remain faithful to our subordinate standards, and do not follow the transient nature of current Western culture, nor adopt its today-popular moral standards, we have experienced treatment at the hands of many in the PCC which has caused us much pain and raises alarm, for we have collectively experienced many instances of slander, ridicule, racism, and even sadly demonization, which all unequivocally seems to be saying that there is no place for “the Korean” in this denomination, and

WHEREAS, similarly in our nation’s past, the actions of our forebearers indicated that there was no place for First Nations peoples who held on to their culture, beliefs and practices in this “new nation,” and such sentiments were promulgated by our own denomination as we established numerous denominationally-run residential schools, for which we have rightly confessed and spelled out the nature of our sins, as indicated in our confession:

We acknowledge that the stated policy of the Government of Canada was to assimilate Aboriginal peoples to the dominant culture, and that The Presbyterian Church in Canada co-operated in this policy. We acknowledge that the roots of the harm we have done are found in the attitudes and values of western European colonialism, and the assumption that what was not yet moulded in our image was to be discovered and exploited.
(The Confession of the Presbyterian Church in Canada, 1994)

However, is our denomination now really different from the denomination of our past, and should the dominant culture in our denomination not entertain the possibility that they are perhaps again following in the hegemonic sins of their ancestors? And for this reason congregations in our Presbyteries implore the larger PCC to take notice of our current plight of marginalization in our denomination, and provide a safeguarded place for us here, for we believe that we too are created in God’s image and have a specific mandate from God to live out our gospel calling in this nation, which is in complete accordance to our denomination’s subordinate standards. And therefore advise that the dominant culture in our denomination tread carefully as it attempts to dictate what should be considered to be authentic, faithful, Christianity, not only in our own denomination, but also to the wider, global church, with which it is at odds, and

WHEREAS we encourage The Presbyterian Church in Canada to be The Presbyterian Church “in” Canada, and not The Presbyterian Church “of” Canada, and we believe that for our denomination to live up to its name, it must take into account the multiple expressions of Presbyterianism not only embodied in our Han-Ca congregations, but as well wonderfully represented in many other ethnic expressions such as those found in Arabic, Chinese, Taiwanese, Hungarian, Spanish, Portuguese, . . . Presbyterian congregations of our denomination, and

WHEREAS there is a danger when the PCC does not take into account other forms of presbyterianism but only relies on one, Western cultural expression of it — it may find itself to be in error, but not able to recognize it, for when multiple expressions of presbyterianism (and Christianity) come together, the truest, most accurate and faithful expression of it will likely be found at the intersection of these multiple expressions. For this reason we hope that the PCC does not continue to ignore the many voices and expressions of presbyterianism in the PCC, of which the Korean expression is but one, to their overall detriment.

THEREFORE, we humbly Petition the 146thGeneral Assembly to confess their sins in written response to the large ethnic contingent of our denomination who have been mistreated by the dominant culture in our denomination because we and other ethnic minorities are not willing to abdicate our God-given expressions of Christianity to assimilate to the form of Christianity which the dominant culture dictates.

Western Han-Ca Presbytery Overture re: Sister Denomination

To the Venerable 146th General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in Canada:

WHEREAS, Korean congregations from 1967 onwards entered into a mutual covenant with the Presbyterian Church in Canada for the reason that our theological and doctrinal beliefs, expression of faith and worship, and governance were in consonance with those of the Presbyterian Church in Canada; and

WHEREAS, these beliefs of the Presbyterian Church in Canada are found in our subordinate standards – the Westminster Confession of Faith adopted in 1875 and 1889, the Declaration Concerning Church and Nation of 1954, and Living Faith (and its translations) adopted in 1998; and

WHEREAS, each minister and elder ordained in The Presbyterian Church in Canada has vowed to accept and uphold the teaching and doctrine contained in our subordinate standards, and under the continual illumination and correction of the Holy Spirit speaking in Scriptures; and

WHEREAS, the decisions and recommendations made at the 145th General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in Canada in 2019 indicate a departure in the beliefs, character and identity of the Presbyterian Church in Canada, and now presents itself to be a different denomination from the one which we first entered into mutual covenant with; and

WHEREAS, this change in the nature of our denomination is clearly evident in remits B and C of the 145th General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in Canada, which are in contradiction to our subordinate standards; and

WHEREAS, this change in the nature of our denomination is not only evident in the proposals outlined in Remits B and C, but are rather symptomatic of the wider departure in beliefs of our denomination as evidenced in the statement by the convenor of the Special Committee re Implications of Option B (Inclusion) that was received without objection, “In truth we differ theologically on many things; the role of scripture, the virgin birth, the resurrection, the place of children, of women and the priorities of the church” (2019 A&P, pg. 49), much of which also contradicts our subordinate standards (our Beliefs on Scripture – WCF I, XIV.i, XIV.ii, XVIIL.ii, XIX, XXI.v; LF – 1.3, 1.4, 5, 8.1.5; our beliefs on the virgin birth – WCF 8.2; LF 3.2.1; our beliefs on the resurrection – WCF VIII.iv, XL.i, XXXII; LF 2.1.4, 3.5.1, 3.5.2, 10.4); and

WHEREAS, this departure from the subordinate standards by many in the denomination is not without a damaging effect and impact upon Han-Ca congregations, and greatly undermines the evangelism and the public witness of Han-Ca congregations within the Korean-Canadian community, and poses a real and significant challenge for the Pastoral ministry of current members, some of whom have expressed the intent to withdraw their membership and leave the Presbyterian Church in Canada because of the change in the nature of the denomination as evidenced in the remits; and

WHEREAS, the continued movement away from the subordinate standards of the Presbyterian Church in Canada that were the basis of our covenant with the denomination, despite the unambiguous opposition of Han-Ca congregations, has functioned to silence the collective voice of the ethnically Korean congregations and threatens the existence of our congregations as we currently stand; and

WHEREAS, the provision for liberty of conscience and liberty of action in the remits does not mitigate the aforementioned threats and challenges to the healthy ministry of the congregations within the Han-Ca presbyteries because of the denominationally sanctioned departure from the subordinate standards; and

WHEREAS, the liberty of conscience and action in the remits cannot be guaranteed in perpetuity, according to the Book of Forms, and as evidenced in the history of that provision for the ordination of women which was granted in 1966 and revoked in 1982; and

WHEREAS, the joint petition of Western and Eastern Han Ca Presbyteries to the 143rd General Assembly in 2017 called for unity and expressed our desire to work with the denomination on moderate changes on the matters of human sexuality, and

WHEREAS, we, as Presbyterians, passionately love The Presbyterian Church in Canada, its mission and its ministry and in spite of our differences both culturally and theologically, we would prefer to remain one body and a part of The Presbyterian Church in Canada; and

WHEREAS in the face of potential passage of Remit B and C under the Barrier Act, the Western Presbytery, together with other traditionally orthodox congregations cannot accept the proposed changes in doctrine regarding the definition of marriage, nor the proposed practices of ordination as voiced in Remits B and C (2019) therefore feel we are being forcefully pushed to the edge of adoption of changes of doctrine and practice of the church or calling for a separation;

THEREFORE The Western Han-Ca Presbytery concludes that it is in the best interests of Korean congregations, sympathetically with other traditional-orthodox congregations, to seek departure from our beloved denomination, and we do so with great sadness. In the interests of enabling the mission of all congregations of the PCC, we hereby request that the General Assembly consider creating a partner or sister denomination (name to be determined), releasing the Han-Ca congregations and other traditional-orthodox congregations who wish to leave the PCC because of the understanding of the theological differences that divide us. This new partner or sister denomination would share common resources including the Presbyterian Pension Plan, enabling all congregations in their mission and ministries according to their theological convictions. The Western Han-Ca humbly overtures the Venerable, the 146th General Assembly to consider our cry and prayer on this subject seeking the immediate action of this Assembly, or to do otherwise as the General Assembly, in its wisdom, may deem best.